Opinion 9 min read

Women in leadership: Are there lessons for the UK from other nations

Despite the progress Britain may have made in terms of women in senior management, against a global average of 24 per cent the UK still places in the bottom ten countries for women in the boardroom.

Shockingly, a 2014 Grant Thornton report shows that the 24 per cent global average has remained unchanged from 2013, and even from 2007. This suggests that the proportion of women in senior management has returned to its natural level following the financial crisis during which women were disproportionately hit.

So what have we truly accomplished Have we really, as EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding suggests, seen the first cracks in the glass ceiling

2010 saw the launch of the 30% Club. This was followed by a goal set by the Mervyn Davies 2011 review. It suggested that the UK should aim to have 25 per cent of women on boards by 2015.

In 2013, the European Parliament also voted to back a proposed law to improve gender balance. This legislation would mean that by 2020, 40 per cent of non-executive directors would have to be women. Of course, SMEs were excluded from the directive. This ruling is currently pending.

According to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), the representation of women rose from 12.5 per cent in 2011 to 20.7 per cent in 2014. And a Cranfield International Centre report revealed that only 24 more females were needed on FTSE 100 boards int order to reach that target.

Related content:

Being so far down the ranks, however, maybe taking a look at the way other countries have tackled the issue and where they stand on the global scale can help the UK find other solutions.

Does Australia fare any better The country ousted their first female prime minister Julia Gillard for, well, being a woman after accusing her of sexism.

I think as a nation, and this is also true of countries like the UK” weve not yet culturally embraced women and leadership,” said Gillard in an interview when she was asked how Australian women were faring. “Somehow were finding it difficult to correlate female leaders and likeability.”

Arguably, a lot can be learnt from them though.

Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) figures suggest that the number of boards with no women have dropped from 87 to 42. In fact, the percentage of women has nearly doubled from its 10.7 per cent in 2010 to its current 18.3 per cent.

This is partially due to the AICD’s diversity initiative. In 2011, all company directors contributed to the development of a new ASX reporting regime and diversity policy.

And its chairmen mentoring and board diversity scholarship programmes have ushered many female directors into such appointments.

In certain areas France also seems to be outperforming the UK. A 2011 bill, called the Zimmermann Cop , gave companies a three year deadline to increase female board positions to 20 per cent. This is set to rise to 40 per cent by 2017.

In June 2014 it was found that 30 per cent of directors on boards, including the CAC 40, were women. This blew the Down Jones 30, with 23.5 per cent, and the FTSE 100, with 22 per cent at the time, out of the water.

In fact, in a published report, ‘Balanced Reputation between Men and Women in Business Law: The French Quota System to the Test of EU Legislation‘, it said: This article suggests that the French approach is wide reaching in its coverage of executive as well as non-executive directors and, as such, goes further than the proposed EU directive and has the potential to be a role model within the EU.

And who can forget Norway, the country who set quotas into motion. When the country called for a 40 per cent quota in 2003, the world watched with bated breath to find out whether this would lead to the appointment of unqualified directors.

Women’s wages also come close to men’s in Norway, even if it’s still at 80 per cent.

But it’s one of the world’s poorest country’s that lead the equality ranking. Burundi, where four out of five people live below the poverty line, is the top country in women’s pay, earning 83 per cent of salaries of men in the same jobs.

And, believe it or not, Denmark is the only place where women earn on average more than men. Sure it’s only a two per cent difference, but that’s a great statistic when it comes to increasing a female’s chances of leadership. This is largely because many women get better paid jobs than men. But when both genders do the same job, a woman will only earn 71 per cent of what a man makes.

At the core of it all, let’s face the fact that although we put Norway on a pedestal, not one of its large cap companies has a female CEO.

“The pressure to increase womens representation was applied to all political parties in Scandinavia,” said Professor Drude Dahlerup of Stockholm University. This has led to an encouraging 40 per cent quota, but beyond that, women fall short.

Other countries that have gone on to implement corporate gender quotas perform in a similar manner. Disappointingly, Spain (22 per cent), Germany (14 per cent), and Switzerland (13 per cent) have some of the lowest proportions of women in senior management roles in the world. All despite policy involving the gender gap.

Even in bigger countries such as the US, things aren’t any better. Although women comprise nearly half of the workforce, Catalyst research found that only 14.3 per cent hold top executive office positions at Fortune 500 Companies. Only 20 per cent of senior management roles are held by women. 

In the end, is that all that legislation can afford us

Read more about what we can learn from BRICS countries.

Perhaps we should really be turning our eyes to the BRICS (Brazil,Russia, India, China andSouth Africa).

Francesca Lagerberg, global head of tax at Grant Thornton, said: Emerging markets do seem really to value some of the things that women bring to boards and senior roles. The approach to business is different and theres a real recognition that innovation and creativity are sometimes more closely linked to female leaders.

This comes hand-in-hand with Grant Thornton data, suggesting that the proportion of senior roles filled by women across the BRICS exceeds 30 per cent, compared with about 20 per cent in the G7. This is also higher than the 24 per cent global average.

These striking statistics are further seen in China.

Although China still lags behind in terms of providing sufficient support for career women, the country has achieved tremendous progress.

Women occupy 21 percent of the positions on company boards in China and hold 38 per cent of corporate senior management positions.

More astonishingly, perhaps, is the fact that more than 60 per cent of CFOs are women. And, with 30 per cent of entrepreneurs being women, they have made more money for themselves than any other country apart from the US.

According to Dominic King, Grant Thornton’s global research manager, The concept of ‘opportunity for all’ is deeply embedded in Chinese society and has boosted gender equality. Rapid urbanization, which allows more women to work, plus reduced child care burdens stemming from the family planning policy also are factors.

Russia leads the way when it comes down to the number of female senior managers at 43 per cent, but they probably have the least to Alright, Russia’sprevious influence of communism may have actively promoted women,but this is largely due to unchangeable circumstances. Although the country has twice the number of women in such positions than the US or Western Europe,Grant Thornton chalks this down to Russia’s demographics, where women outnumber their counterparts by 6:5. It was also estimated that women outliving men had a large role to play as well.

That being said, Bella Zlatkis, deputy chairwoman of Russias Sberbank, believes that if a woman is willing to build her career, she can do it. There is no glass ceiling in Russia.

According to Oliver Wyman, women account for 20 per cent of the members of the executive committees of major Russian financial companies. And they all specifically state that this has had nothing to do with legislation.

In one of its own studies, the company states: “Women there have benefited from the legacy of a drive by the former Soviet Union to promote female participation in the work force. That push meant that Russian women in the early 20th century began working in industries that were still considered male bastions in the West.”

When it comes to politics, only 21.8 per cent of national parliamentarians were female. This is where Rwanda reigns supreme, with an astonishing 63.8 per cent.

In an article published by Juliana Kantengwa, a member of the Rwandan parliament and vice-president of the Pan-African parliament, said that it was by no means an easy task.

Low literacy levels among rural Rwandan women meant women were inclined to vote for her husbands choice; urban women also tended to be more vocal than rural women; and male candidates were often better connected with wider networks among the local administration and local communities than women.

But we went around the country and educated women on the benefits of the secret ballot; we ensured small parties were represented in every electoral coalition; and we put in place electoral laws that meant female candidates could not be out-competed by a better connected male candidate.

The UK, with less than one in four members of Parliament female, still has a long way to go toward equal representation. The quota system may seem like a drastic measure, but Rwanda is proof it works.

Today you wouldnt find a single Rwandan man or woman who disputes that the influence and leadership of women has been essential to Rwandas social and economic progress. The proof of this is in the overwhelming public election of women to our parliament. Our constitutional quota only provides that 24 of the 80 seats in the Chamber of Deputies be reserved for women, but the electorate has consistently voted for more women.”

She notably adds at that end that perhaps the UK could do the same. It’s certainly something we should strive towards. They definitely help prove the adage that women make a difference, be it on a company board or in a political role, and have gone out of their way to add more females not because it was needed, but because they saw the difference it could make.

Concerned with issues surrounding gender diversity in business Don’t miss Real Business’s First Women programme:

Drawing on ten years of the First Women movement and the phenomenal network of pioneering women the Awards has created, this programme features The First Women Awards and The First Women Summit – designed to educate, mentor and inspire women in all levels of business.

Share on social media

Link copied to clipboard.